I haven’t laughed as much for a long time as on Census night 2016. The internet sarcasm almost converted me to lifelong tweeting.
We tried to get through for an hour, with final responses suggesting we try again in two days.
The organisation behind #CensusFail graciously promised we wouldn’t be fined for being late.
The flood of social media comments included a photo of the IT cat inside the bureau’s pc, and suggestions they try turning it off and then on again. Others said these same people guaranteed to keep our data safe.
Undoubtedly the most historic tweet came from the man who, according to then Prime Minister Tony Abbott in 2013, had “virtually invented the internet in this country”:
This is the Prime Minister that Albo predicted the other night might last a year!
According to the Sydney Morning Herald:
Census was delivered by technology company IBM using its Australian SoftLayer cloud. Figures from the Australian Government’s procurement agency AusTender show IBM was paid $9,606,725 in 2014 to design, develop and implement the “eCensus”.

That certainly cut the cost of scurrying Census collectors, although, as it turned out, the ABS shouldn’t have relied on IBM to handle the inevitable storm in the local cloud.
This morning, the ABS boss is trying to blame denial-of-service (DoS) attacks from “an international source”.
Kalisch says it all went smoothly, and they fended off three attacks, until a fourth about 7:30 pm, when they decided to shut the site down.
As if a government data collector mightn’t expect antagonism here or there.
But, as Age economics editor Peter Martin revealed this morning, the ABS has a “reckless” new culture at the top. (David Kalisch in so much trouble that I won’t go on about him, of all people, using “data” in the singular.)
The fact is that the ABS organised its own DoS flood of messages. That’s if we believe ABC News:
In the lead-up to census night, the ABS spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on load testing and said its servers could handle 1 million forms per hour.
Let’s do a simple sum. Let’s assume only 10 million forms. At one million per hour, that would take 10 hours, assuming everyone were nice and orderly.
Perhaps not unusually, we had a small party to upload our information. After something to eat and a Barossa red, we opened up the laptop about 8:20 pm. Annoyance eventually turned to social media hilarity, and we set a date for another Census party.
What did these people think? That they could insist that everyone was legally required to participate (as, apparently, television advertising kept reminding through the evening), and not expect an after-dinner rush?
Perhaps IBM staff assumed people would fill in their forms at work. Perhaps neoliberal bureaucrats have already abolished all life’s rhythms, ridding the world of penalty rates, at least in their heads.
And you don’t think meals matter!
Well said! What a shemozzle! Puts paid to talk of online voting for a very long time I should think.
LikeLike
The full size of Turnbull’s catastrophe has hardly yet sunk in. From the estimates, his government variously angered and amused at least 10 million frustrated submitters last night.
LikeLike
yes, well said
what an unmitigated disaster
this was a worse-case scenario that was even worse, much worse
the wriggling and squirming was worth it, however
the sound you hear is heads rolling down Mugga Way
what was Watson doing?
the significance is that this could be the end of the census
certainly of any hope of one involving the internet
it will be back to pencil and paper, possibly as soon as next week
the whole concept of a census is ridiculous in an age of the internet and big data
of course, the solution is to mine the big data that the internet generates
to extract the information the government, etc, needs
(the security services probably do that now)
if I may suggest, your next census dinner should be based around tripe
R
LikeLike